Showing posts with label snow white and the huntsman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label snow white and the huntsman. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

It Came From The Cineplex: The Huntsman: Winter's War

The Huntsman: Winter's War was written by Evan Spiliotopoulos and Craig Mazin, and directed by Cedric Nicolas-Troyan.

Spiliotopoulos has written a ton of direct-to-video Disney sequels, such as The Jungle Book 2, The Lion King 1 1/2, Tarzan II, Cinderella III: A Twist In Time and The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning. Apparently he's the go-to guy when you need a quick followup to a popular fairy tale film. He also wrote the screenplay for the 2014 Hercules (the one starring The Rock), proving he's a sadistic bastard who hates humanity.

Mazin previously wrote Rocket Man, The Specials, Scary Movie 3 and 4, School For Scoundrels and The Hangover Part II. It looks like Mazin also hates the human race and is trying to hurt us all deeply.

Nicolas-Troyan was the special effects supervisor for Snow White And The Huntsman. This is his first time in the director's chair.

Confusingly, The Huntsman: Winter's War is both a prequel AND a sequel to Snow White And The Huntsman. The first half hour or so takes place years before the original film, while the rest happens shortly after. It's like the Godfather 2 of fairy tale movies. In structure, that is. Definitely not in quality.

The movie features an A-List cast including Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain— both of whom ought to know better than to sign up for something like this. Chris Hemsworth and Charlize Theron were reportedly paid $10 million each to reprise their roles, so that may have had something to do with the quality cast.

So let's get to the question everyone's no doubt asking— why the hell is there no Snow White in this Snow White sequel? There doesn't seem to be any clear answer. There are rumors floating around alleging that Universal fired actress Kristen Stewart (who played Snow in the first film) because she had an affair with Rupert Sanders, the (married) director of the first film. Others claim the studio never had any plans to use Stewart in any sequels, intending all along to spin off Chris Hemsworth's Huntsman character into his own franchise. Who knows what really happened? 


If I had to guess I'd say they dropped her because of money. Believe it or not, four years ago when Snow White And The Huntsman was made, Kristen Stewart was the highest paid actress in Hollywood (the bloom's definitely off that particular rose now). It would not surprise me if they just couldn't afford to bring her back this time out.

Whatever your feelings about Kristen Stewart's acting talents, there's no denying that the absence of Snow White leaves an awkward hole in the film. The writers feel the need to address her truancy, explaining that due to the influence of the Magic Mirror, she's "not well" and unable to participate in the proceedings. This is realized through the magic of a couple of brief clips from the first film, and a body double seen only from the back (shades of Ed Wood and Plan 9 From Outer Space!). 


This feels like a slap in the face to fans of the character (and to Stewart herself, I suppose). In the first film, Snow White went from a lowly prisoner to the badass commander of an entire army. She even killed Queen Ravenna singlehandedly! And now we're told that she's holed up in her castle, overcome by an obsession with a stupid mirror? Better they should never have mentioned her at all.

I have to admit, I remembered absolutely nothing about the original film. I know I saw it, as I wrote a review of it four years ago. Apparently it was so spectacularly unmemorable that every aspect of it faded completely from my mind. I watched it again right before seeing the new film, and I swear it was like seeing it for the first time.

SPOILERS, I GUESS.

The Plot:
Many years before the events of the first film, the evil Ravenna (played by Charlize Theron) hoodwinks a King into marrying her, then kills him and inherits his kingdom, because every gal needs a hobby. We also discover that Queen Ravenna has a younger sister named Freya (played by Emily Blunt), who she loves so much she never talked about her at all in the first film.

Freya has a secret and forbidden affair with the Duke of Blackwood. Ravenna finds out about the affair, and that Freya is pregnant. She learns the child will grow up to become "fairest of them all," something Ravenna cannot abide. Shortly after Freya gives birth, Ravenna uses the Jedi Mind Trick or something on the Duke, compelling him to kill his own daughter. Well, that took a dark turn, didn't it? When Freya finds her dead child, she flies into a rage, which wakens her dormant ice powers. She kills the Duke and flees into the north.

Elsa, er, I mean Freya uses her powers to build a massive ice palace in the north. She sends out regular raiding parties to capture children, training them to become deadly warriors. Among these abducted children are Eric and Sara. She warns her child army that love is forbidden in her kingdom, because it only leads to misery and heartache. Well, I can't argue with her there.

Time passes. Seven years before the start of the first film, Eric (played by Chris Hemsworth) and Sara (played by Jessica Chastain) have grown up to become Freya's two best warriors. Eric's a master with an axe, while Sara's an expert archer. They're also secretly in love, and vow never to leave one another's side, brazenly tempting the screenwriting gods. Sara gives Eric her heirloom medallion, announcing they're now "married." Freya finds out about their forbidden love, and zaps a large ice wall between them. Eric watches helplessly as Sara is seemingly killed on the other side of the wall by a fellow huntsman. Riddled with grief, Eric escapes the ice palace. He then wanders the realm, drowning his sorrows with massive amounts of booze.

The movie then jumps completely over the events of Snow White And The Huntsman, which I'm sure can't possibly confuse the audience. It's now several months after that film. Snow White's husband King William meets with Eric in the forest. He says Snow isn't doing well, as she's become obsessed with Ravenna's magic mirror. It seems the mirror's now talking to her (?), much like the One Ring. William ordered the Mirror taken to Sanctuary (the magical fairy realm from the first movie) for safe keeping. Unfortunately the Mirror was stolen en route. William asks Eric to recover the Mirror and make sure it gets to Sanctuary. Eric agrees. William sends two dwarves, Nion (played by Nick Frost, reprising his role from Snow White And The Huntsman) and his half brother Gryff, along with Eric. I guess due to downsizing throughout Snow White's kingdom, they couldn't afford to send seven dwarves this time.

At an inn, Eric and the dwarves are attacked by Freya's hunstmen. They're rescued by a mysterious, hooded figure with a bow and arrow. Gosh, I wonder who that could be? Turns out it's Eric's "wife" Sara, who's not dead after all! Gasp! She's furious with Eric, who she saw leave her for dead when Freya erected the ice wall between them. Eric tells her that's not what happened, swearing he saw her killed. He figures out that in addition to physically separating them, Freya caused each to have visions to emotionally drive them apart.

Sara doesn't buy the whole "magic visions" thing, and feels betrayed by Eric. The two spar for a while in an effort to eat up some screentime, and of course eventually reconcile, to absolutely no one's surprise.

Just then the four are caught in a snare by two female dwarves named Bromwyn and Doreena. Eric convinces them to help find the Magic Mirror. Despite the fact that Nion and Gryff hate all dwarvish women and think they're hideous, they warm up to these two diminutive ladies very quickly.

The group tracks the Magic Mirror to a goblin city, and after an underwhelming battle with the very gorilla-like goblin king, manage to steal it back. They take it to the borders of Sanctuary. Unfortunately before they can stash it there, Freya appears with her army. She reveals that Sara was working with her the whole time to get the Mirror. Gasp again! Nion and Doreena attack, but Freya freezes them solid and has them hauled back to her castle so they can be thawed out at the end of the movie. Whoops! Spoiler Alert! Eric tries to stop Freya, but Sara fires an arrow into his chest, seemingly killing him.

After Freya leaves with Sara, Gryff and Bromwyn see that Eric is still alive. Sara, the expert archer, deliberately shot an arrow into the medallion she gave him, making it appear she killed him. They head for Freya's palace to rescue Sara.

At the palace, Freya looks into the Magic Mirror and asks it who's the fairest of them all. The Mirror seems to melt, and transforms into Ravenna. Apparently seconds before she died in the first film, she uploaded her soul into the Mirror, and has been chilling inside until now. She begins making plans to kill Snow White and invade her kingdom, blatantly trying to usurp Freya's kingdom. Rwarrr! Cat fight!

Eric, Gryff and Bromwyn sneak into the ice palace. Eric's captured by Freya's huntsmen, and Ravenna sentences him and Sara to death. Eric manages to convince the huntsmen to revolt. Ravenna starts sprouting black spidery arms, which is a new power for her, and uses them to kill several of the huntsmen. Freya erects another ice wall to protect her and Ravenna. Eric and the others then simply start climbing the wall to get over it (a concept Donald Trump doesn't seem to understand).

Meanwhile the two sisters start arguing again. Freya realizes that the Duke killed their child because Ravenna zapped him with a spell (because she couldn't stand the idea of the child becoming more beautiful than her). Freya then turns against Ravenna, joining forces with Eric and Sara. Ravenna stabs Freya. Before she dies, she freezes the Magic Mirror, and Eric shatters it with his axe, causing Ravenna to shatter. Freya sees Eric and Sara embrace and says they're lucky, and then dies.

Freya's child army is freed, and Eric, Sara and the dwarves live happily ever after, until the next movie. Of course we see a gold-coated bird fly overhead, implying that Ravenna will be back yet again.

Thoughts:
• Rarely have I seen a franchise that rewrites or outright ignores major events the way this one does. In order for this film to work, it has to negate much of what happened in the first movie. The biggest of these retcons is Freya The Ice Queen herself.

In Snow White And The Huntsman, Queen Ravenna had a very intimate relationship with her brother Finn. In fact they seemed more like lovers than siblings (gross). She even used her immortality powers to keep him young (well, young-ish) and alive far past his natural age. Ravenna even spoke about how Finn had has been at her side since they were children.

Note that never once in the first movie does Ravenna ever mention having a younger sister. Freya is a completely new character who's grafted onto this story to serve as a fill-in for Ravenna until she reappears. Retcon!

The first time we meet Eric in Snow White And The Huntsman, he's a hopeless drunk who's trying to drown his grief after the death of his beloved wife. At no time does he ever imply that she was anything other than a normal stay-at-home wife.

The Huntsman: Winter's War tramples all over that continuity by revealing that Eric's wife Sara is a skilled and accomplished huntsman, just like him! We also see that they were never actually wed in the traditional sense. Sara placed her medallion around Eric's neck, pronouncing them "man and wife" herself, without the benefit of clergy. And their "marriage" apparently lasted for a couple of hours at most, before Sara was seemingly killed. Recton again!

In Snow White And The Huntsman, Finn taunts Eric by telling him that he raped and murdered his wife (yikes!). This enrages Eric so much that he kills Finn. In The Huntsman: Winter's War, we see that Finn did no such thing. In fact he doesn't even appear in the film at all! As far as we know he never even met Sara! I suppose we could say that Finn lied in the first movie just to mess with Eric— he is a sadistic bastard after all. If that's the case, then his little joke backfired, as it caused him to get killed. Did someone say retcon?

In the first film the Magic Mirror contained a passive "Mirror Man" entity whose sole function was to always tell the truth. It's also implied that only Ravenna can see the Mirror Man, as Finn saw her seemingly talking to herself. In this film the Mirror is an evil, corrupting presence that compels anyone who gazes into it to kill everyone around them. In essence it's now become the One Ring, from The Lord Of The Rings.


I suppose I could be generous and say that Ravenna, who's stored her soul in the Mirror, has taken it over and is the one handing out these orders. It still seems like a major retcon to me though.

As I said, the script has to bend over backwards (and how) in order to work.


• I'm sure the fact that this movie features an Ice Queen with wintery superpowers has absolutely nothing to do with the phenomenal success of Disney's Frozen. Nope, all purely coincidental!

Seriously, Freya IS Elsa here. They might as well have gone all the way and just made her a CGI animated character.

• Missed opportunity: At no point does any character in the film tell Freya the Ice Queen to "Let it go."

• In a related note, Eric's wife Sara has wavy red hair, is an expert archer, and is suspiciously similar to Merida from Disney/Pixar's Brave.

• In the first film, Ravenna becomes Queen by marrying Snow White's father and then killing him. She does the same thing in the prequel part of this film. It's implied that she's done this many times before, tearing through kingdom after kingdom like a swarm of locusts through a field.

So just how big is this realm? You'd think after usurping eight or ten thrones over the years, news of her little scam would spread. Seems like after a while kings would start recognizing her and turn off the lights and pretend they're not home when she comes a knockin.'

• Liam Neeson is the narrator of the film. They get their money's worth out of him too, as he's forced to spout a ton of expository dialogue to set up the story, and then explain that we're jumping over everything that happened in the first film, as we go from prequel to sequel. I'm surprised he didn't lose his voice after all that narration.

• Chris Hemsworth's faux Scottish accent is much better this time around. Well... maybe not better, but at least it's consistent this time. It came and went quite a bit in the first movie.

• In Snow White And The Huntsman there were eight dwarves, played by an amazing group of character actors, including Ian McShane, Bob Hoskins, Ray Winstone, Toby Jones, Eddie Marsan, Johnny Harris, Brian Gleeson and Nick Frost.

Apparently the studio could only afford one dwarf from the first film this time out, as Frost is the only actor to reprise his role.

• In the first movie the "Little People Of America" organization complained because Universal Studios cast actors of normal stature as dwarves and digitally shrank them, instead of hiring actual little people. I didn't hear a peep out of them this time out. Maybe they finally gave up complaining about such methods after The Hobbit films?

• When Eric first hooks up with Nion and Gryff, they go on and on at length about how much they hate all dwarf women, who they consider hideous and repulsive. Later we meet two female dwarves, Bromwyn and Doreena. The thing is, they're nowhere near as ghastly as the males implied. In fact they look about like everyone else in the film. Then minutes after the male dwarves meet the females, they start shamelessly and awkwardly flirting with them.

So... I guess the joke is that the males were exaggerating? Is that it?


• At one point Sara betrays Eric by revealing she's really working with Freya. She shoots him with an arrow and he falls dead to the ground.

Of course he's not really dead, since they're trying to set up a franchise with him as the star. Seconds after Freya and Sara leave, Eric comes back to life. Apparently Sara actually shot the medallion (the one she gave him) around his neck, which only made it look like she killed him. Wha…?

We clearly see the arrow sticking out of his chest after he falls. But when he wakes up, he yanks it out of the medallion, which is all of an eight of an inch thick. How the hell could an arrowhead stick into something that thin? Even worse, he holds up the medallion and there's no hole in the middle!

The only way any of this could work is if Sara shot him with a novelty suction cup arrow.

• Snow White And The Huntsman featured some interesting creature designs, such as trolls and fairies. Here we get some goblins who look pretty much like hairless gorillas. Oh, and Freya rides some half polar bear, half snow leopard thing, that's realized through the magic of circa 1995 CGI.

In fact everything in this film feels scaled down and smaller. The budget for the first film was $170 million, while this one was a mere $115 million, so that's no doubt why everything looks cheaper here.


The Huntsman: Winter's War is a completely unnecessary prequel/sequel hybrid that has to overwrite much of the first movie in order to work. It feels like a desperate attempt to set up a franchise by shifting the focus to the Huntsman character, who's honestly not all that interesting. I give it a C.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

It Came From The Cineplex: Men In Black 3, Snow White & The Huntsman, Battleship, Prometheus, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

SPOILERS, I GUESS.
You've been warned.

Men In Black 3
A troubled production from the get go that happily turned out to be the best of the series. 

It's a fun little romp that just may surpass the first two installments. It was definitely miles above Men In Black 2 and I think I even liked it better than the first one.

According to internet reports (which as we all know are of course unimpeachable), director Barry Sonnenfeld started filming the movie without a completed script. They had the first act written but no second or third acts. They even built a hiatus into the shooting schedule so that they could stop filming in order to figure out the storyline and finish the script! 

Who does this? Who starts a project that costs hundreds of millions of dollars without having an ending to the story? I will never understand this attitude. Studios think nothing of spending millions on sets and special effects, but God forbid they spend more than $1.98 on a decent script.

Despite all this backstage turmoil, the film somehow turned out pretty darned good. I wouldn't recommend that any future film makers try it though.

Josh Brolin's performance as the Young Agent K is nothing short of astonishing. He absolutely nails the look, speech patterns and mannerisms of Tommy Lee Jones. In was downright eerie at times. I truly believed I was watching a younger Jones. I don't know if his performance was Oscar™ worthy or not, but he definitely deserves some kind of award for his work.

Just an observation: I am assuming that this movie takes place in the present day. Agent K says he's 29 years old in 1969. That would make him 72 in 2012. Don't MIB agents ever get to retire? Also, without getting too spoilery, there is evidence in the movie that Agent J was 5 or 6 years old back in 1969. That would make him 48 or 49 in the present day. Is he really supposed to be that old?

Part of me wonders if introducing a younger version of Agent K was a sneaky way of ensuring the continuation of the franchise, should Tommy Lee Jones decide to retire. They could easily figure out some way to snatch the young Agent K from the past and bring him permanently into the present. Time will tell, I guess.

The MIB Agency gets a new Chief in this movie, as Agent O (played by both Emma Thompson and Alice Eve) replaces Agent Zed (played by Rip Torn in the first two movies). I have to wonder if Zed's "death" was written into the script in response to the recent legal and criminal problems that have plagued actor Rip Torn in the past few years? Did they not want to deal with him and his many legal troubles? Or did they just want to provide a love interest for Agent K? 

Some of the time travel in the movie was a little wonky (especially the part where Agent J gets a do-over when fighting Boris), but that's par for the course in any movie that deals with traveling to the past, and I was willing to overlook it.

The Plot:
In the present day, Boris the Animal, last of the alien Boglodite race, escapes from the LunarMax colony on Earth's moon. He was placed there back in 1969 after being captured and losing his left arm to Agent K (Tommy Lee Jones), thus preventing a Boglodite invasion of Earth. Boris plans to go back in time and kill K, thus preventing his incarceration and allowing the invasion of Earth to succeed this time.

Boris' plan works and all traces of Agent K are wiped from the present day. Curiously only Agent J (Will Smith) remembers K and goes back in time to prevent him from being killed in the past. 

In 1969, Agent J meets a young (well, youngish) Agent K (now played by Josh Brolin) and the two have to team up to save Earth and restore the timeline.

Pros:
• Josh Brolin is amazing as Tommy Lee Jones as Agent K. 

• Better than the first two movies. 

• Interesting production design and aliens, as always. 

• A surprisingly heartfelt ending. 

Cons:
• Honestly, I got nothing.

A rare case of the third leg of a trilogy turning out better than the first two. I give it a B+. 

Snow White And The Huntsman
Snow White gets the Lord of the Rings treatment.

Seriously, this movie has some severe Lord of the Rings envy. Don't believe me? The end credits say they even used MASSIVE, a computer animation program that simulates realistic crowds and armies. The very same program that Peter Jackson used in all three Lord of the Rings movies to depict battles between humans and orcs. This film practically sprains itself trying to remind us of Tolkien.

Overall it's not a terrible movie, but it could move along a bit more quickly. One way they could have streamlined the script: by removing the completely superfluous character of William, Snow White's childhood friend and later rival for her hand. He serves absolutely no purpose in the movie whatsoever, except perhaps to provide very weak competition to the Huntsman for Snow's affections. I'm sure he was included to try and work a Twlightian love triangle into the proceedings, but honestly every one of his scenes could have been excised without damaging the plot in the least.

One other complaint: The Snow White vs. Ravenna face off is built up all through the movie, and when the two finally confront one another, poof! The battle's over in thirty seconds. Their showdown should have been a bit more epic and drawn out.

Recent reports declare that Kristen Stewart is now the highest paid actress in the country. I don't begrudge Ms. Stewart her millions as I'm sure she worked hard for them, but I will say that I honestly don't get it. I just don't understand her appeal. She's attractive enough I suppose, but she seems to wear the same expression of blank bemusement in every single scene.

Supposedly the "Little People of America" organization is protesting this movie. They're riled because the film cast actors of normal stature for the parts of the dwarves and digitally shrank them, instead of hiring actual little people. Sigh... OK, suppose we go ahead and appease these people and exclusively hire only little persons to fill the eight roles (yeah, there were eight dwarves, not seven. Don't ask). Let's see, who could we hire? Well there's Peter Dinklage of course. And then there's... um... Oh, yeah, the guy in the Willy Wonka remake! Deep Roy or something. OK, there's two. Let's see, who else? Umm... the black guy from Bad Santa? OK, that's three. Still need five more... Billy Barty's dead... Vern Troyer I guess, although he's probably too little to be a proper dwarf.

See the problem? I'm sure the producers would have been more than happy to hire actual short statured actors but there just ain't a whole lot of them out there right now.

The Plot:
Snow White (Kristen Stewart) is the daughter of King Magnus and Queen Eleanor. After the Queen's untimely death, the on-the-rebound King marries the beautiful but treacherous Ravenna (Charlize Theron), who kills him and takes over his kingdom. She then imprisons young Snow White in a cell for years instead of killing her outright, like you'd expect an evil Queen to do.

Ravenna controls a dark army made of glass (yeah, glass) and needs to periodically drain the youth from young women in order to maintain her beauty. Her Magic Mirror tells her that if she consumes Snow White's heart, she will gain immortality. Darn the luck, Snow escapes her cell right before Ravenna can rip open her chest.

Ravenna hires Eric the Huntsman (Chris Hemsworth, who is having one hell of a year, appearing in three movies this summer) to track down Snow White. He finds her, but ends up siding with her because she reminds him of his late wife or something. 

It takes forever, but eventually the Seven (actually Eight) Dwarves finally show up, giving the film a much needed dose of humor. Then Snow White eats the poison apple, she falls into a coma and the Huntsman comes along and plants one on her kisser and wakes her up. Then Snow White, who's spent most of her life locked away in a dungeon all by herself, reveals that she is in fact a master tactician and takes control of a neighboring kingdom's army. She storms the castle, defeats Ravenna and becomes Queen.

Pros:
• The Seven or Eight Dwarves were a hoot and added some much needed humor into the proceedings. 

• Nice production design. 

Cons:
• A little too long. 

• The final battle between the two gals was over a little too soon. 

A stylish adult take on the classic fairy tale. I give it a B-.

Battleship
Well, it's come to this. 5,000 years of human civilization has brought us to this point: a movie based on the board game Battleship.

When the opening credits of a movie read, "Universal and Hasbro present," well, then you know you're not in for Shakespeare.

I would dearly love to know the genesis of this project. I strongly suspect that a year or two ago a Hollywood movie producer went back his childhood home in rural Idaho or Kansas for Xmas. His retired parents didn't have cable or any copies of Variety laying about and bored out of his mind, he accepted his young nephew's offer to play his newly received copy of Battleship with him. As the producer played the nautical strategy game for the first time he thought to himself, "Where has this amazing game been my entire life? The intense strategies involved! The suspense! The thrills! This would make an exciting and compelling motion picture! I'm writing up a treatment as soon as I get back to civilization!" That's how I'm assuming it happened anyway, until I find evidence to the contrary.

The whole thing is a love letter to the Navy and has a healthy respect for the armed forces in general, especially veterans. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Battleship also stars Liam Neeson, Taylor Kitsch and god help us, someone named Rihanna. If you're a Neeson fan (and who isn't) prepare to be disappointed. He's in the movie for a grand total of ten minutes. Apparently he needed a yacht payment and stopped by the set for a couple of hours.

Poor Taylor Kitsch. First he starred in the horribly named John Carter which is on track to become the biggest money-losing movie in history. Then he follows it up a couple of months later with this movie, which isn't exactly setting the cineplex on fire. He needs an agent transplant, STAT!

Why, oh why is Rihanna in this movie? Is it some kind of stunt casting, in a feeble attempt to draw young girls into this male-skewing film? It reminds me of how 1960s Westerns would star Henry Fonda, Jimmy Stewart and then Fabian. 

To say Rihanna is miscast is an understatement. This is the kind of part that Michelle Rodriguez has made a career playing and there's no reason she shouldn't have been in this movie instead. In fact the next time I see it, I'm just going to imagine Michelle Rodriguez is actually on screen every time I see Rihanna pop up. 

One standout in the cast: Army Colonel Greg Gadson. Gadson is a real life double leg amputee (and not a cgi creation as some nimrods think) and makes his acting debut in the movie as, what else, a wounded veteran. He does a pretty good job too, especially in a scene where he and his group are confronted by aliens and he says, "I got this," quickly dispatching one of the hapless extraterrestrials. 

I found the soundtrack of the movie to be extremely annoying. This isn't a movie that has a traditional instrumental soundtrack that enhances the action; instead it's the kind that blares a different rock song for a few seconds at the beginning of every scene change. We're in the admiral's office, so they play a few seconds of Boston. We switch to a scene on the bridge of a destroyer and we hear a few bars of AC/DC. I hate this type of soundtrack. It's lazy and the only reason they do it is to pad the soundtrack so they can sell it on CD. 

Well, we now have a taste of what a Halo movie might look like should one ever get made. The aliens' armored suits bear a very strong resemblance to the ones worn in the Halo video game franchise. 

Surprisingly there are a few parts of the movie that don't quite make sense. Taylor Kitsch's character is shown to be a directionless slacker who is forced into joining the Navy by his responsible brother. Somehow Kitsch rises up in the ranks and becomes some kind of commander. I don't think so.

 At one point we learn that the invading aliens can't handle Earth's bright sunlight. Yet during a night battle we find out that they can't see the human destroyer attacking them. So they can't see in the light and can't see in the dark either. These aliens have some definite sight issues. 

Most importantly, they didn't say it. You know what I'm talking about. If you've ever played Battleship even once in your life, you know that when you lose a game piece you're supposed to cry, "You Sunk My Battleship!" just like in the toy commercial. The entire point of making a movie like this is to see Liam Neeson growl that iconic line. Yes, I know that  most of the ships in the movie were destroyers and not actually battleships. You want accuracy from a movie like this? People wanted to hear the line! And it never came! The closest we got was some 90 year old veteran who says, "They'll never sink this battleship!" Close but not ever remotely the same. Director Peter Berg says he considered adding the line, but was afraid the audience would laugh. Really? You just made a movie based on a board game and you're afraid people will laugh? It's far too late to start worrying about that. I'm going to go ahead and blame the movie's poor box office performance on the absence of the Line. 

Lastly I would be remiss if I didn't comment on the song played over the end credits. As the movie ends, the soundtrack surges up to 11 and blares "Fortunate Son" by Creedance. Um... that's certainly an unusual choice. This is very definitely a pro-military, pro-soldier movie, so of course it only makes sense that they'd end it by playing a famous anti-war protest song. Did the producers not listen to the lyrics? Didn't they read the liner notes? It's a song about a guy who's angry about being drafted because he's not "fortunate" enough to be the son of a rich senator or businessman who could buy his way out of the draft. The perfect way to end your pro-war movie!  

Despite the fact that the entire world (and me) is ragging on this movie, I actually kind of liked it. They somehow managed to base a movie on a freakin' board game but still told a semi-coherent story. I will admit there's nothing deep here, but it entertained me for two hours, and in the end isn't that what a movie's supposed to do?

The Plot:
Several years ago a group of scientists, led by a guy doing his best Jeff Goldblum impression, sent a signal to a planet they suspect could contain life. Apparently the message they sent was, "Aliens, Start Your Invasion," because that's just what they do. An alien force sends a scouting party to Earth to scope out the planet and see if it's ripe for a good takeover. The alien ships land in the Pacific near Hawaii and proceed to enclose the area inside a huge forcefield bubble, trapping several Navy destroyers inside with them. 

The alien ships have superior fire power of course, which consists of bombs that look like giant versions of the pegs in the game. I sh*t you not. The bombs look exactly like the game pieces. It actually took my mind several seconds to fully comprehend what I was seeing on the screen and that I wasn't hallucinating. Let me just emphasize it one more time: the alien's bombs look exactly like the pegs in the game. 

The alien ships also hover a few feet over the water, as if they're afraid of getting their feet wet. The ships don't fly, instead they leapfrog over the human ships because of course they do. I assume this was to make them act more like the ships in the game, which of course don't ever move and aren't of alien origin. So now that I think about it, I have no idea why the ships leapfrog and hover. 

The alien ships make short work of all but one of the destroyers, which is helmed by our hero Lt. Alex Hopper (Taylor Kitsch), a free-spirited slacker who somehow became a naval officer. The aliens begin building an antenna to beam the "Invasion is a go" message back home, adding a countdown to the movie and giving our heroes something tangible that they can blow up. During a battle the destroyer is, well, destroyed, but not before it takes out the dome and all but one of the alien ships. The surviving crew, including our hero Hopper, then head for the last battleship in existence or something, the mothballed Missouri. 

But wait! It's an old ship full of outdated technology! Who could possibly show them how to use it? Why, none other than a squad of retired geriatric sailors, who whip the ship into shape with the power of a montage. The Battleship then takes on the final alien ship and wins the day. 

Pros:
• As good a movie that's based on a board game that you're likely to get. 

• Does a good job of working the game play into the plot. 

•  A love letter to Navy veterans. 

• Col. Greg Gadson. Despite the fact that he has no legs, I firmly believe he could still kick my ass.

• Goofy, but fun. 

Cons:
• A hopelessly miscast Rihanna torpedoes every scene she's in. Where's Michelle Rodriguez when you need her?

• The Jeff Goldblum knockoff wasn't nearly as funny as he thought he was.

• Annoying soundtrack.

• Very bizarre choice of closing song. Someone on the staff needs to listen more closely to "Fortunate Son."

• NO ONE SAYS, "YOU SUNK MY BATTLESHIP!" The nerve! 

A cross between Independence Day and a watchable Transformers. I give it a B-.

Prometheus 
Directory Ridley Scott returns to the universe he created in 1979's ALIEN. For months before the movie's release the internet was abuzz about it, speculating as to whether it was a sequel, prequel or a new story set in the same universe. Scott didn't help matters any by remaining coy on the subject, saying only that it "shared strands of ALIEN's DNA, so to speak." Whatever the hell that means.

In the end he gave us a story that's definitely set in the same universe, and sort of is, but kind of isn't, a prequel. Do yourself a favor and just don't worry about it. You'll live a happier life that way.

Prometheus very much wants to be a thinking man's sci-fi movie, but unfortunately most of the ideas it toys with are of ripped straight out of Chariots of the Gods and not all that interesting. It raises many questions about the origin of life and humanity's place in the universe, but then doesn't bother to answer them. When I saw that the film was co-written by Damon Lindelof of LOST fame, it made perfect sense. LOST was never big on serving up answers to the endless questions it raised and the same goes double here. Unanswered questions aren't necessarily a bad thing as they can jumpstart audience discussion, but here I get the impression the filmmakers thought vagueness equaled cleverness.

Unfortunately there's some wonky science going on in the movie too. At the beginning of the film one of the Engineers appears to willingly dissolve his body so that his disassembled DNA can jump-start life on Earth. If that's really what happened then where did single celled life forms, dinosaurs, mammoths and all those type of things that appeared before man come from? Why didn't humans just spring up out of the muck, fully formed?

Also at one point the scientists study a sample of the Engineer DNA and proclaim that it's IDENTICAL to that of humans. Um... no. The Engineers are giant musclebound blue humanoids; to even suggest that their DNA is the same as ours is beyond ridiculous. I would be willing to buy that it's similar, but identical? Someone on the writing staff needs to read a textbook.

Guy Pearce plays Peter Weyland, the trillionaire sponsor of the expedition, in some truly horrendous 1970s era old age makeup. It's really bad. So bad that it stops the story dead in its tracks while you sit there and think, "They couldn't have found a real old man for this role?" Supposedly they chose a young actor to play the part of an ancient man because they filmed some flashback scenes between a younger Weyland and David the android, but they were cut for time. Strange how every other aspect of the production is top notch, but the old age makeup, a technology that's been around since the silent movie era, is so subpar.

Even though Prometheus is presented as "sort of" a prequel, what Scott actually gave us was much closer to a remake of the original film. Consider:

ALIEN
Mining ship receives a distress signal, is rerouted to investigate.
PROMETHEUS
Humans discover cave paintings that they decode as a map, or signal if you will, and send a ship to investigate.

ALIEN
Ship lands on the hostile moon of a ringed planet.
PROMETHEUS
Ship lands on the hostile moon of a ringed planet. 

ALIEN
Crew dons space suits and investigates weird bio-organic caverns. 
PROMETHEUS 
Crew dons space suits and investigates weird bio-organic caverns. 

ALIEN
Crew finds chamber full of leathery alien eggs.
PROMETHEUS
Crew finds chamber full of vases containing DNA altering black sludge.

ALIEN
Crew member is infected. Commanding officer doesn't want to let him in but is overridden. Infected crew member gives birth to alien entity.
PROMETHEUS
Crew member is infected. CO doesn't want to let him in and kills him. Another crew member is secretly infected and gives birth to alien entity.

ALIEN
Android is programmed to retrieve alien specimen by company as a possible bioweapon.
PROMETHEUS
Android is programmed to retrieve alien specimen by company as a possible means of immortality.

ALIEN
Android gets his head torn off, but is still conscious and can speak.
PROMETHEUS
Android gets his head torn off, but is still conscious and can speak.

ALIEN

Entire crew is killed except for lone female officer, who kills marauding alien, leaving her the sole survivor of the Nostromo.
PROMETHEUS
Entire crew is killed except for lone female officer, who kills marauding alien, leaving her the sole survivor of the Prometheus.

Sounds a bit familiar, eh?

The end of the movie seems to be making an effort to link everything up to the start of ALIEN: the Engineer puts on his elephant helmet, sits down at his control station that looks like a giant gun and attempts to blast off in his ship. His ship then crashes in the exact same position as the one we eventually see in ALIENS. All well and good, except that as I mentioned earlier this is NOT LV-426, the planet seen in ALIEN & ALIENS. So apparently the exact same failed takeoff events happened on two different planets. Why even bother ending the movie with this scene and confusing the audience further? 

If you're a regular reader of my blog (and frankly who isn't) you know by now that one of my pet peeves is sci-fi movies with fantastic technology that take place too close to the present day. Prometheus is one of these movies. It takes place in the unimaginably distant year of 2089 ( a whole 77 years from now) yet features faster than light space ships with artificial gravity as well as a self-aware android virtually indistinguishable from humans. NASA couldn't launch a spacecraft to the moon right now if there was a gun to their collective heads; there's no way in hell that we could ever possibly have anything even close to the movie's technology in 77 short years. I'm assuming they placed the movie when they did because according to the ALIEN DVD, that movie takes place in 2122, which is also too damned soon.

The Plot: 
Two scientists discover a series of similar cave paintings in various areas on Earth. Making a very large   and unscientific intuitive leap, they deduce that the paintings are an "invitation" from aliens they dub "The Engineers," whom they believe to be the forefathers of humanity. For some reason they believe the Engineers want us to come and pay them a visit. 

Somehow they convince the huge and powerful Weyland Corporation (in the days before they became Weyland-Yutani) to fund the creation of the science vessel Prometheus in order to follow the map and meet humanity's makers.

They arrive at the distant moon LV-223 (which you will note is a completely different moon from LV-426, which is where the events of ALIEN and ALIENS took place) and find remains of several alien structures there. They investigate the structures, finding various bizarre life forms inside. Against all logic and scientific protocol they bring the head of one of the aliens inside Prometheus, while several of the other crew members are infected with other life forms.

Soon all hell breaks loose as the cast is picked off one by one and the scientists realize that the planet is actually one big military weapons base. Even worse, one of the Engineers is still alive and aims to take his ship full of bio-weapons back to Earth. Why? We're never given a compelling reason, other than perhaps that the Engineers are a bunch of space assholes. It's then up to the remaining crew of the Prometheus to stop the ship and save the Earth.

Pros:
• Visually stunning.

•  Michael Fassbender is excellent as David the android. 

Cons
• Some really bad science on display, especially involving DNA.

• Really bad old age makeup on Guy Pearce.

• Despite all the crowing about its original story, the film is a virtual remake of ALIEN.

While I welcome the return of the ALIEN universe, the story could have been better. I give it a B. 

Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter
Seth Grahame-Smith does it again. A few years back he "wrote" Pride And Prejudice and Zombies, a classic literature/horror mashup that basically consisted of him taking Jane Austen's novel and injecting zombies into it every couple of chapters.

He did the same thing a couple of years later with Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter.

I will be honest-- I am not a fan of the book. It's written in the form of a series of letters and essays from Lincoln with vampires thrown in now and then. I was bored stiff by it. 

Naturally since I was less than enthusiastic about the book, I had little interest in the movie. Then I saw the trailer and it looked like they'd ramped up the action considerably, giving me hope that it might actually be good. Alas, my hopes were dashed yet again by the finished product.

The main problem with the film is that it absolutely races through Lincoln's life, skipping over decades of important details. He starts out at age nine. In an instant ten years pass and he's nineteen. The movie then completely skips over his first love Ann Rutlidge (and her subsequent death), who isn't even mentioned in passing. Then he decides to "put away his axe to concentrate on his political career. Boom, he's now fifty years old and president, completely leaving out his years as a senator! They show us Lincoln's son Willy, but never mention the fact that he had three other children. OK, so I didn't expect a movie like this to be an accurate historical record, but if you didn't know anything about Lincoln before seeing this movie, you're not going to much more by the end. 

The cast does a decent enough job I suppose. Benjamin Walker is top notch as Abe, and looks very much like a young Liam Neeson. Dominic Cooper and Rufus Sewell round out the cast as dueling vampires.

Just look at the two of them! Why, they could almost pass as sisters!

One bit of casting I did find unintentionally hilarious: Lincoln's only wife was Mary Todd Lincoln, and by all accounts she was not an easy woman to look at. So of course in the movie she's portrayed by the stunning Mary Elizabeth Winstead. The resemblance is uncanny, I tell you!

I'm a little curious as to why the author chose vampires as the enemy of choice here. Maybe because he'd already used zombies in his previous work? The reason I bring it up is because they don't seem to act much like traditional vampires. Sure, they suck blood, do their best to bite you and can turn invisible, but other than that... the sun doesn't seem to bother them much (other than causing them to wear sunglasses) and no one ever brings up the notion of jamming stakes into their hearts. They're also susceptible to silver, which is usually associated with werewolves. Vampire movies need rules if they're going to work. The audience needs to know if sunlight causes them to burst into flames or just give them a bad headache. Do stakes in the chest work, or must they be decapitated? It's important to lay down rules for your monsters and then stick with them. 

The film brings up some interesting ideas, but the aforementioned breakneck pace ensures that they're never around long enough to appreciate. The concept of an unstoppable Confederate army made up of the undead? How cool is that? Too bad we only get to see it for a scant thirty seconds or so before it's on to the next big setpiece.

The movie ends with Lincoln riding off to Ford's theater, completely ignoring the book's ending in which we find out that Abe is still alive in the present day, turned into an immortal vampire by his mentor because he's "too interesting to let die."

Normally I shun 3D and avoid it like the plague. Due to unimportant circumstances I was forced to see this movie in glorious post-converted three dimensions. It added absolutely NOTHING to the film or the movie going experience (as usual). The only thing it did is remove an extra three dollars from my wallet. Half the time I forgot I was supposed to be watching a 3D movie; the only thing that occasionally reminded me of the fact were the floating dust motes present in every single scene. Lincoln apparently lived in the glorious Age of Dust, as nearly every scene in the movie features several dozen dust motes drifting lazily across the screen in front of the action. In fact after a time I began watching the dust motes more than I did the actors. Hey, it's only natural, they were haniging right there mere inches from my face. I wish I was a member of the Motion Picture Academy so I could nominate the Dust Motes for best supporting actors.

The Plot:
Abraham Lincoln hunts vampires.

Pros:
• Some cool concepts that ultimately weren't given enough screen time.

• Decent performances.

•  If your anger is intense enough, you can cut through a tree with a single axe stroke.

Cons:
• Leaves out too many details.

• Takes itself WAY too seriously.

• Needs some vampire rules.

A mediocre adaptation of a book I didn't particularly care for. I give it a C.
Related Posts with Thumbnails
 
Site Meter